Slovak Motorways (PPP) D1 Phase I | Accountability Console
Complaints IAMs Register Login

Loading...

Slovak Motorways (PPP) D1 Phase I

Issues

Consultation and disclosure

Description: Complaint raises concerns regarding inadequate or absent consultation about or disclosure of project information, including project impacts and/or mitigation plans.

Complaints with this Issue: 526

Browse Complaints

Other

Description: Complaint raises concerns about impacts that do not fit in one of the other categories. Complaints about which there is no publicly available information regarding the issues raised are also included.

Complaints with this Issue: 215

Browse Complaints

Sectors

Infrastructure

Description: Project relates to construction or improvement of large structures, facilities, or public works projects. Examples include roads and other transportation projects, sanitation and water treatment facilities, power plants, and industrial facilities.

Complaints in this Sector: 964

Browse Complaints

Project

Name: Slovak Motorways D1

Investments: EIB

Client:

Support: Loans

Country: Slovakia

Complaint

IAM: Complaints Mechanism (CM)

ID: SG/A/2009/04

Date Filed: Oct. 20, 2009

Date Closed: Jan. 8, 2010

Status: Closed With Outputs

Description

20 October 2009 CEE Bankwatch Network lodged a complaint to the EIB Complaints Inbox concerning the Project Slovak Motorways D 1 (SLOVAK MOTORWAYS PPP D1 PHASE I 2008-0070). The complainant alleged that the EIB would have failed to consult the Slovak authorities as regards her request for disclosure of the Public Sector Comparator calculation and the affordability assessment for the public budget; moreover the Complainant contested the motivation provided by the EIB when rejecting her application for disclosure of the documents provided by the Slovak authorities (including the concession agreement) and used by the EIB in its appraisal of the economic and financial feasibility of the Project. Finally, she challenged the EIB’s decision not to disclose a full copy of the Appraisal Report including the cost-benefits analysis and claimed access to such information. As a result, the complainant argued that, in the context of the contested request for access to information, the EIB would have failed to comply with its own Public Disclosure Policy (PDP) as well as with Regulation 1049/2001.

Complaint Stages

Filing

Oct. 20, 2009

Filing

Status:

Start Date: Oct. 20, 2009

Registration

Oct. 20, 2009 -

Oct. 20, 2009

Registration

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: Oct. 20, 2009

End Date: Oct. 20, 2009

Eligibility

Oct. 20, 2009 -

Dec. 1, 2009

Eligibility

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: Oct. 20, 2009

End Date: Dec. 1, 2009

Dispute Resolution

Not Undertaken

Dispute Resolution

Status: Not Undertaken

Explanation: Not offered by mechanism, Dispute resolution was not an option in this case

Compliance Review

Dec. 1, 2009 -

Jan. 4, 2010

Compliance Review

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: Dec. 1, 2009

End Date: Jan. 4, 2010

Has Compliance Report: No

Non-Compliance Found: Yes

Monitoring

Not Undertaken

Monitoring

Status: Not Undertaken

Explanation: Mechanism deemed involvement unnecessary; Mechanism deemed involvement unnecessary, Mechanism chose not to monitor

Closed

Jan. 8, 2010

Timeline