"allegations of corruption and financial mismanagement" Since there are two inadmissible complaints in 2014 and they are not clearly attached to IDs, this description had to be matched to the complaint based on deduction. Of the two 2014 inadmissible complaints, one has a joint client (FMO and DEG), and one has a single client (FMO). Since the joint client 2014 complaint has been deduced to be complaint #14-003 (listed in AR 2019), this becomes the other FMO 2014 complaint. (AR 2014 source: '2.1 Overview of complaints received', pg 2, https://www.fmo.nl/l/en/library/download/urn:uuid:04721ba1-2875-43b0-bf4e-f7871280fcc9/icm+annual+report+2014+-+hy+2015.pdf) (AR 2019 source: '2.1 Overview of complaints received', pg 5, https://www.proparco.fr/fr/ressources/annual-report-deg-fmo-proparco-independent-complaints-mechanism-july-2018-december-2019)